How ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity describe your company
Where AI assistants get what they say about your company, why they get it wrong, and a practical routine to audit and fix it, with sources as of October 2026.
ASDK TeamPublished 7 min read
On this page
TL;DR
- AI assistants describe your company from two sources: what the model learned during training, and what it finds in a live web search at answer time. The second is where you have the most influence.
- Each assistant searches differently, but all of them build answers from pages they can crawl, index and trust — your own site and what others publish about you.
- To change what they say, fix the sources: clear facts on your site, consistent third-party listings, crawlers allowed. Then measure with a fixed prompt set and the reports Google now provides.
Why this matters for B2B companies
Buyers now ask assistants before they ask you. In a Gartner survey of 645 B2B buyers (August–September 2025), 45% said they used generative AI during a recent purchase, "primarily to gather information on vendors and products." The same survey found buyers split on trust: asked where they are more likely to encounter misleading information, 51% said generative AI and 49% said a sales rep. And 69% prefer to validate AI-generated insights with sales reps.
That gives you two jobs: make sure the assistant's first answer about you is right, and make your own site the place where buyers can check it.
Two sources of what an assistant "knows"
A large language modelA large language model (LLM) is an AI model trained on vast amounts of text to predict the next token, which lets it write, summarize, translate and answer. starts with what it learned in training: text collected up to a cutoff date, including pages fetched by training crawlers such as OpenAI's GPTBot or Anthropic's ClaudeBot. That memory is broad, but it is frozen and blurry on details. Ask a model about a mid-sized B2B company from memory alone and you may get an outdated plan name, a feature from a competitor, or a confident invention — a hallucinationAn AI hallucination is a fluent, confident answer from a language model that is false or unsupported, such as an invented price, policy or citation..
So assistants also look things up. They run a web search, read a handful of pages and write an answer from them, usually with citations. This is groundingGrounding means tying an AI model's answer to specific, verifiable sources, such as your own pages or a search index, so each claim can be checked., and it is the path you can influence, because it runs on pages you publish and pages about you that others publish.
How each assistant looks things up
ChatGPT
OpenAI's help center says ChatGPT "may search the web automatically when your question would benefit from current information," and users can also start a search by hand (OpenAI). When it searches, it "typically rewrites your query into one or more targeted queries" and may send them to partner search providers; the privacy policies OpenAI links for those providers are Microsoft's and Shopify's. The pages it can show and cite come through OAI-SearchBot, and OpenAI says sites that opt out of that crawler "will not be shown in ChatGPT search answers" (OpenAI crawler docs).
Gemini and Google's AI features
Google's Grounding with Google Search documentation describes the loop: the model "determines if a Google Search can improve the answer," generates and runs one or more queries if needed, then answers with citations. For AI Overviews and AI Mode inside Google Search, Google says the features are "rooted in our core Search ranking and quality systems" (optimization guide) and may use "query fan-out" — "issuing multiple related searches across subtopics and data sources" (AI features documentation).
One control is easy to miss. The Google-Extended robots.txt token governs use of your content for Gemini training and for grounding in Gemini apps and Vertex AI, but it "does not impact a site's inclusion in Google Search" (Google). Blocking it keeps you in AI Overviews but can keep you out of Gemini app answers.
Perplexity
Perplexity says it searches "the internet in real-time" and that "each answer includes numbered citations linking to the original sources" (Perplexity Help Center). Its index is built by PerplexityBot, which Perplexity says is used "to surface and link websites in search results" and "not used to crawl content for AI foundation models" (Perplexity docs).
Side by side
| Memory | Live search | Crawler to allow | Shows sources | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | OpenAI models | When useful or on request; own index plus partners | OAI-SearchBot | Citations and a Sources panel |
| Gemini | Gemini models | Grounding with Google Search when the model judges it useful | Googlebot; Google-Extended not blocked | Citations in grounded answers |
| Google AI Overviews / AI Mode | Google's models | Google Search index, query fan-out | Googlebot | Supporting links |
| Perplexity | The underlying model | Real-time search for each question | PerplexityBot | Numbered citations |
Blocking these crawlers is covered in robots.txt for AI bots. The short version: block training if you like, but blocking search crawlers removes you from these answers.
What decides which pages get used
No assistant publishes its full ranking logic, and Google's guide to generative AI features says plainly that "no third-party tool has access to our internal ranking or AI systems." What the documentation and research do support:
- Eligibility first. For Google's AI features, a page "must be indexed and eligible to be shown in Google Search with a snippet." For ChatGPT and Perplexity, the page must be reachable by their search crawlers.
- Relevance to many sub-questions. Fan-out and query rewriting mean an answer is built from several narrow searches. A page that clearly answers "Does X integrate with HubSpot?" can be picked even if your homepage never ranks for the broad question.
- Specific, original content. Google's guide puts it directly: "Don't just recycle what others on the internet have already said, or could easily be produced by a generative AI model."
- Evidence in the text. In the GEO study (KDD 2024), adding quotations, statistics and cited sources to pages raised their visibility in generative-engine answers by up to about 40% in the authors' benchmark, while keyword stuffing gave little or no improvement. It was a lab benchmark run on 2023–2024 systems, so treat it as direction, not a formula.
Third-party sources count too
Look at the citations under answers about your company. Besides your own site, you may find review platforms, comparison articles, directories, forum threads and partner pages. Assistants that search the web describe you partly the way the web describes you. If a directory still lists a product you discontinued, or a three-year-old review quotes old pricing, expect to see it repeated.
Why assistants get companies wrong
The usual causes, in rough order of how often they are fixable:
- The fact isn't on your site in plain text. Pricing in an image, integrations behind a script, or "contact us for details" on everything.
- Your own pages disagree. Gartner found 69% of B2B buyers saw inconsistencies between a vendor's website and what its sellers said. Inconsistent pages confuse models the same way.
- Stale third-party pages. Old reviews and listings outnumber your current pages.
- Name collisions. A similarly named company, product or open-source project gets blended into yours.
- The answer came from memory. No search was run, so the model filled gaps from training data.
OpenAI's own help page warns that "search results and citations can be incomplete, outdated, or incorrect." Plan for errors; do not assume they are rare.
A routine to audit and fix your AI presence
Write a fixed set of test prompts
Ten to fifteen questions a buyer would ask, phrased the way people talk: "What does Example Co do?", "How much does Example Co cost?", "Example Co vs Competitor for a 50-person team", "Does Example Co integrate with Salesforce?", "Is Example Co SOC 2 compliant?". Keep the wording identical every time you test.
Run them in each assistant and save the answers
Use a logged-out or clean session where possible, ask for sources, and save the answer and the cited URLs with the date. Answers vary between runs, so repeat important prompts two or three times.
Trace every error to a source
For each wrong statement, open the citations. Is it your page, a third-party page, or no source at all? That tells you what to fix.
Fix the source, not the symptom
Correct your own page first, with the fact stated in one plain sentence and a date where it changes. Then ask third parties to update listings. Keep your Google Business Profile and Merchant Center data current; Google's guide says they can help products and services appear in AI responses.
Keep a simple log
A spreadsheet is enough. One row per prompt, per assistant, per run:
| Date | Assistant | Prompt | Correct? | Wrong statement | Cited source | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | ChatGPT | "How much does Example Co cost?" | No | Quotes a plan retired last year | Third-party review from 2024 | Ask the reviewer to update; add "Plans and prices as of October 2026" to the pricing page |
| 2026-10-21 | Perplexity | "Does Example Co integrate with Salesforce?" | Yes | — | Example Co integrations page | None |
After two or three rounds, the pattern is usually obvious: a handful of stale pages cause most of the errors.
Recheck monthly
Search indexes need time to recrawl. Rerun the prompt set monthly and track how many answers are correct and how many cite your site.
What doesn't work
- AI-only files and rewrites for Google. Google's guide says you don't need machine-readable AI files, special markup or Markdown, and that "there's no special schema.org markup you need to add." An llms.txt file may help some agents, but not Google Search.
- Manufactured mentions. Google says pursuing inauthentic mentions "isn't as helpful as it might seem."
- Keyword stuffing. The GEO study found it gives little or no improvement in generative answers.
- Blocking everything, then asking why you're invisible. No crawl, no citation.
How to measure it
- Google Search Console now has a Generative AI performance report showing impressions in AI Overviews and AI Mode by page, country, device and date; Google says it was rolled out to all websites as of August 31, 2026.
- Google Analytics groups visits referred by assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Deepseek, Copilot or Grok into an AI Assistant channel. AI Overviews and AI Mode clicks stay in Organic Search.
- Server logs show
OAI-SearchBot,ChatGPT-User,PerplexityBotand similar fetches of your key pages — a leading indicator that your pages are being used. - Your prompt set: percentage of correct answers and of answers citing your site, month over month.
The site-side groundwork — crawl access, facts in HTML, labeled forms — is in the agent-ready website checklist.
Try the Agent-Ready agent in early access
Makes your site readable and usable for ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and other AI agents.
Practitioners now call this work generative engine optimizationGenerative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of making content more likely to be found, used and cited by AI systems that write answers to questions., while Google calls it "still SEO." Either way, the job is the same: publish clear, consistent facts where assistants look, and check what they say about you on a schedule.
Frequently asked questions
Where does ChatGPT get information about my company?
From two places: what the model learned in training, and live web search when it decides current information would help. Search answers use OpenAI's search index, built by OAI-SearchBot, and partner search providers.
How do I correct wrong information an AI assistant says about my company?
There is no edit button. Fix the source: publish the correct fact clearly on your own site, update third-party listings that repeat the error, keep search crawlers allowed, and recheck the answers every few weeks.
Do I need llms.txt or special markup to appear in AI answers?
Not for Google. Its guide says no special AI files, markup or schema are needed for AI Overviews and AI Mode. Being indexed, eligible for snippets and genuinely useful is what counts.
Can I pay to be recommended by ChatGPT or Gemini?
Organic answers are not sold. Google says no third-party tool has access to its internal ranking or AI systems. Be skeptical of any vendor that promises placement in AI answers.
How do I measure my visibility in AI answers?
Use the Generative AI performance report in Google Search Console for AI Overviews and AI Mode, the AI Assistant channel in Google Analytics for referred visits, and repeat a fixed set of test prompts.
Sources
Pages we read for this article, with the date we checked each one.
- Searching the web with ChatGPT — OpenAI Help Center — accessed October 20, 2026
- Overview of OpenAI crawlers — accessed October 20, 2026
- Grounding with Google Search — Gemini API documentation — accessed October 20, 2026
- AI features and your website — Google Search Central — accessed October 20, 2026
- Optimizing your website for generative AI features on Google Search — Google Search Central — accessed October 20, 2026
- Google's common crawlers (including Google-Extended) — Google Crawling Infrastructure — accessed October 20, 2026
- How does Perplexity work? — Perplexity Help Center — accessed October 20, 2026
- Perplexity crawlers — Perplexity documentation — accessed October 20, 2026
- GEO: Generative Engine Optimization (Aggarwal et al., KDD 2024) — accessed October 20, 2026
- Gartner survey finds 69% of B2B buyers turn to sales reps to validate AI-generated insights — Gartner (May 2026) — accessed October 20, 2026
- Gartner sales survey finds 61% of B2B buyers prefer a rep-free buying experience — Gartner (June 2025) — accessed October 20, 2026
- Introducing Search Generative AI performance reports in Search Console — Google Search Central Blog (June 2026) — accessed October 20, 2026
- [GA4] Default channel group — Google Analytics Help — accessed October 20, 2026